![]() |
|
S8C22P9-2: At a higher magnification, some of the vessels show areas of fibrinoid necrosis; there are fragments of nuclear debris in the same areas. The infiltrating cells are neutrophils and eosinophils ( leukocytoclastic angiitis). |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
S8C22P9-6: The pattern is that of a classic lymphocytic infiltrate of the dermis. To the right, the papillary dermis and the upper portion of the reticular dermis are edematous; there are mild vacuolar changes at the dermal-epidermal interface. The perivenular infiltrates of the reticular dermis form prominent “cuffs” about the vessels; they extend to the lower 1/3 of the dermis. The dermis shows solar elastosis. The changes are compatible with polymorphic light eruption (in agreement with the clinical impression). The keratin layer, for the most part, is loosely laminated. The patterns have a “vasculitic” quality. In the areas of dermal edema, there are loose infiltrates of lymphoid cells among delicate, widely spaced collagen bundles. |
![]() |
|
S8C22P9-7: The epidermal changes do not suggest a diagnosis of lupus erythematosus. From my interpretation of reports in the literature, papillary dermal edema seems to be more common in lesions of polymorphic light eruption in the Northeastern portion of the USA than in the South. There are loose infiltrates of lymphoid cells and histiocytes in the interstitial spaces of the reticular dermis (see also S8C22aP9a-1).
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||